--- Chad Fowler <chadfowler / gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/17/05, Jim Freeze <jim / freeze.org> wrote:
> > * Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin / yahoo.com> [2005-06-18
> 04:15:40 +0900]:
> > 
> > > Anybody else think it would be nice if we had a gemserver
> > > running on rubyforge (or wherever) that had documentation
> for
> > > all available gems on rubyforge?  I think all that would
> be
> > > needed would be to have some machine install all gems
> (and new
> > > ones as they are uploaded) and have a gemserver running. 
> This
> > > would allow people to get at the docs without having to
> install
> > > the gem or the developer wouldn't have to upload the docs
> on
> > > every release.  It would also be nice to have links in
> the
> > > rubyforge project page to the gemserver.
> > 
> > Would be nice if rubygems had a doc only install so that
> you
> > could install docs for all gems, reqardless of
> architecture.
> > 
> > --
> 
> I've added the doc-only install idea to our list.

I made an official feature request for this on rubyforge.  Tom
Copeland likes the idea.  But, he wants the "doc-only" option. 
He asked me to bug the rubygems guys about it, so ... can you
up the priority?

http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104&aid=2044&group_id=5




		
__________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail 
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour: 
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html