On 6/15/05, Timothy Hunter <cyclists / nc.rr.com> wrote:
> Austin Ziegler wrote:
> > angles. At the same time, if I use the broken transformation, then I
> > have to work harder at things like SVG or RVG transformations. I'm
> "RVG" transformations?

Why not? RVG works against a canvas. If I provide people a way to
insert a PDF document into that canvas and it Does The Right Thing,
then RVG and PDF::Writer graphics could be done with the same code. I
suspect that it will be harder than I want, but that's something that
could be worked out. It's also not a high priority ;)

> > I'm looking for advice, people. I'm tempted to release 1.1 with this
> > fix; it's incompatible behaviour but compatible API, and the only
> > change necessary to your code would be to *negate* the angle.
> Go with your temptation. Shipping the fix now will cause the least
> amount of trouble.

Will be done.

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halostatue / gmail.com
               * Alternate: austin / halostatue.ca