Austin Ziegler wrote: > angles. At the same time, if I use the broken transformation, then I > have to work harder at things like SVG or RVG transformations. I'm "RVG" transformations? > I'm looking for advice, people. I'm tempted to release 1.1 with this > fix; it's incompatible behaviour but compatible API, and the only > change necessary to your code would be to *negate* the angle. > Go with your temptation. Shipping the fix now will cause the least amount of trouble.