Austin Ziegler wrote:
> angles. At the same time, if I use the broken transformation, then I
> have to work harder at things like SVG or RVG transformations. I'm

"RVG" transformations?

> I'm looking for advice, people. I'm tempted to release 1.1 with this
> fix; it's incompatible behaviour but compatible API, and the only
> change necessary to your code would be to *negate* the angle.
> 

Go with your temptation. Shipping the fix now will cause the least 
amount of trouble.