Hal Fulton wrote:
> Ara.T.Howard wrote:
>> HISTORY
>>
>>   0.0.0
> 
> 
> Hmm, I think I used a prior version of it... ;)

Was that 0.0.0.0, or 0.0.0.0.0?  ;)

Ruby folks are so conservative in version numbering that it wouldn't be 
surprising to see negative versions... "Your library looks nice, but I'm 
not going to use use it until it goes positive."