James Britt wrote:
> Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
>> On 5/20/05, James Britt <james_b / neurogami.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Eric Mahurin wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I've never quite understood why most languages inherently
>>>> support returning only a single value
>>> 
>>> Conceptual elegance?
>>> 
>>> Seems cleaner to say that every expression returns an object, though
>>> that the object may be a container for other objects, rather than
>>> assert that expressions may return an unknown number of objects
>> 
>> 
>> Then you would prefer that a function/method only takes one object as
>> parameter, for conceptual elegance?
> 
> Maybe. A vector.
> 
> Or, um, a list.

Vector implements List...
;-)

    Java the Hutt