Nikolai Weibull wrote:
> Glenn Parker wrote:
> 
>>Not the best naming choice, scope != accessability.
> 
> No, but scope has to do with visibility/accessability in a sense.  It?s
> shorter than the only alternative I can think of off the top of my head,
> namely ?restricted_def?,

How about "def_access"?  I suggest keeping "def" at the start (for 
syntax-aware editors), but I wouldn't use this anyway.

-- 
Glenn Parker | glenn.parker-AT-comcast.net | <http://www.tetrafoil.com/>