Glenn Parker wrote: > Nikolai Weibull wrote: > > I¡Çd like to have a def that I can scope in one go, i.e., > > > > class A > > scoped_def :private, :a do > > > > end > > end > > > > I was wondering if anyone has any comments regarding this solution. > Not the best naming choice, scope != accessability. No, but scope has to do with visibility/accessability in a sense. It¡Çs shorter than the only alternative I can think of off the top of my head, namely ¡Èrestricted_def¡É, nikolai -- Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/! Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden. main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}