Glenn Parker wrote:

> Nikolai Weibull wrote:

> > I¡Çd like to have a def that I can scope in one go, i.e.,
> >
> > class A
> >  scoped_def :private, :a do
> >    ãë¥ç
> >  end
> > end
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone has any comments regarding this solution.

> Not the best naming choice, scope != accessability.

No, but scope has to do with visibility/accessability in a sense.  It¡Çs
shorter than the only alternative I can think of off the top of my head,
namely ¡Èrestricted_def¡É,
        nikolai

-- 
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);}