Hi David,

I think you may have the wrong idea here.  I suspect the reference to 
"quantity" here is WRT all the preceeding stats, _rather_ than to your 
own posts.  Having just read this Stats post for the first time I said 
to myself - "boy, there are a lot of them"...

Just a thought,

Greg

David A. Black wrote:
> Hi --
> 
> On Mon, 16 May 2005, Balwinder Singh Dheeman wrote:
> 
>> DISCLAIMER
>> Please, take these stats with a dash of salt, quantity might not always
>> imply any quality.
> 
> 
> I don't mean to sound lacking in humility, but could you please stop
> posting this disclaimer?  I put a lot of effort into trying to write
> helpful and non-frivolous posts, and so do a lot of other frequent
> posters to this list.  If there's something wrong with something
> someone says, please bring it up in the relevant thread.  Warning the
> whole list to be on its guard for nonsense from frequent posters is
> unproductive and rather unkind.
> 
> 
> David
>