--- Michel Martens <blaumag / gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/12/05, Eric Mahurin <eric_mahurin / yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Of all of the method loops above, it only looks like the
> return
> > value of "each" is used.  And then only 3 times (out of
> 1091).
> > 0.3% doesn't sound that useful.  I still haven't found an
> > instance of any of the other method loops above where the
> > return  value is used.  Would anybody support an RCR with
> all
> > but each changed to return nil?
> 
> I would. The method each can also be changed.
> 
> Michel.

It is now RCR 305.  I made changing each an optional part of
the RCR.  Give me some support on this, please.



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail