Kirill Shutemov wrote:
> Is that true, OptionParse has no support of it?

I don't think OptionParse has any way to express "dependencies" between 
options, and that's a good thing.  Given the generality of the problem, 
there is no way it could do a better job than you would using straight 
ruby code.

-- 
Glenn Parker | glenn.parker-AT-comcast.net | <http://www.tetrafoil.com/>