I'm still a sucker for selfclass.

(class << obj; self; end) becomes obj.selfclass

And when we discuss it, it sounds cool: 'Yea, so that method only
exists in the selfclass of the object, ya know?'

Although I like the point that maybe it shouldn't even be called a class...

Ever wonder where they got the name 'functor' that is used in other
languages? Maybe we should make up something just as original for
Ruby's own very original concept. So +1 for the nonsense word idea.

Dan