Ilias,

In message "Re: [RCR] Object#inside_metaclass?"
    on Sun, 8 May 2005 04:09:28 +0900, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias / lazaridis.com> writes:

|> If "singleton class" exists, it has an
|> instance.  It would be an object of which the singleton class holds
|> attributes.
|
|But this object is _not_ an instance of the "singleton class".

Not, in your diagram and definition, and not, in my explained language
model.  But virtually everyone except us (me and you, Ilias) seem to
have the other model in mind.  The object is an instance of the
singleton class in that model.  It is also in the current
implementation of the interpreter.  I'm thinking of changing the
definition to confirm model in others' mind, since the other model.
Under the new model, horizontal arrows in the object.c diagram mean
instance-of relations.

The obstacle is that if I choose the new model, I have to name an
official name to "singleton class", which I agree is not the best term
for it.

|> |You've integrated existing concepts [which have existing terminology].
|> 
|> Then tell me the "existing" term for this concept, which I failed to
|> find in the past.  
|
|I don't know it yet.

Then please come back again when you find the name, preferably
suitable under the new model.

							matz.