Florian Growrote: > Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > >> Friday wrote: >> [...] - (unbelievable) >> >> Please grow mentally up before placing such an amateurish CyberDoctor >> analysis, which could have hurted deeply someone with a >> psych/situation that you describe. >> >> - >> >> As for me, the information is publically available: >> >> simply interconnect those 3 parts >> >> http://lazaridis.com/resumes/lazaridis.html >> >> http://lazaridis.com/core/index.html >> >> http://lazaridis.com/case/ide/index.html > > From what I can tell you have essentially been doing nothing productive > in the last three years. This appears to be further documentation that > Friday indeed appears to be right. Of course. What you don't understand or not see must be nuts. Try it again in one week. > I have seen some efforts of doing things productively (your automated > table evaluation seems to be useful even if I'm not too experienced in > this area) and I even think that you had a point with trying to open up > development of Og of course I have. > -- but clearly trying to denunciate people on a public > mailing list after shouting in their faces is not the right thing. They denunciate themselves [I'm just a catalyst] and: i do not shout. Finally: please evaluate precisely "action vs. reaction". > Producing a patch shows that you can actually write code, perhaps you > could contribute back to more open source projects which would be nice > on a resume as well. my resume is irrelevant. I will reduce it shortly to just the failures. > Please, just take a more sensible / graceful approach and things will > work. Even if you think you *are* right and others wrong you don't need > to show it of course i need to show it. this is part of the process: http://lazaridis.com/efficiency/process.html [but I understand what you are talking about] > -- it will make it harder to admit their failure in case you > are right and harder to admit your own in case they are right. I've no problem to admit failure: LISP - an excercise for experts? http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/msg/169aff411a95dc24 > Sorry if it feels bad for you to discuss these things in the public, but > I fear you would just ignore these kind of mails if they were send > privately to you. Exactly. > Correct me if I am wrong on this (or reply privately, > I don't think anybody will take offense on that) and you would prefer it > otherwise. I would prefere if you could sent me (via email) what I need and what I've asked for: Analytical feedback to my website. > Of course, I could again be falling for trolling, but this time I didn't > push so much effort that it would hurt. I hope others will forgive me in > case I added to the noise side of the ratio... nothing speciall within this list. excessive off-topics. .. -- http://lazaridis.com