Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> In message "Re: [RCR] Object#inside_metaclass?"
>     on Sat, 7 May 2005 21:14:22 +0900, Ilias Lazaridis <ilias / lazaridis.com> writes:
> 
> |> Interestingly, I started to use the term before the book was published
> |> in 1995.  Sad coincidence.
> |
> |I understand.
> |
> |But makes it any sense to insist on that?
> 
> Until we find a better term.  

who is "we"?

The Japanese language development list?

"Please act, and initialize a terminology change."

here, in the core of the ruby community.

> I don't think other terms proposed such
> as "exclusive class" are better.  

even the term "bingo-bongo class" is better.

> I assume Ruby users smart enough to
> deal with them by context until the time.

There are newcomers.

You should show more respect against them.

..

-- 
http://lazaridis.com