On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 14:08, Hal Fulton wrote:
> Logan Capaldo wrote:
> > 
> > Nobody likes this idea? Or is it just so dumb its not worthy of a response? ;)
> > 
> 
> Heh... so far I've never felt a need for these to
> be operators.
> 
> I don't *think* it's a dumb idea. But is it worth
> the trouble of implementing?

Re-re-implementing.  There were (IIRC) at least two working versions
floating around, and a bunch of other "spaceship" forms that were
discussed and may well have been implemented using the "user defined
operators" parser patch.

--MarkusQ