* James Britt <james_b / neurogami.com> [2005-04-28 07:33:00 +0900]:

> Dave Fayram wrote:
> 
> BTW, what should one do when given code that does not pass unit tests? 
> Assume the main code is authoritative, and therefor correct, and change 
> the unit test?

I don't follow this from the previous comments. Unit tests are code,
not documentation. So, when a ut fails, you have two pieces of
code that disagree. Using Dave's language, one (or both) of the 
peices of code have to be lying. :)

-- 
Jim Freeze
Code Red. Code Ruby