On 4/17/05, Jim Weirich <jim / weirichhouse.org> wrote: > On Sunday 17 April 2005 02:29 pm, gabriele renzi wrote: > > I think I already said this once long time ago, but I forgot the > > answer.. why name this method "require_gem" ? It is not the first time > > people get confused about it, and I think something like "use_gem" or > > "Gem.load" would be much better, showing that it does not really act > > like "require" but more like a configuration step. > > I agree. I don't know if it is too late to change the name or not. > Same here. -- Chad Fowler http://chadfowler.com http://rubycentral.org http://rubygarden.org http://rubygems.rubyforge.org (over 100,000 gems served!)