On Apr 14, 2005, at 10:39 PM, Matthew D Moss wrote:

>> (Note that an Array could be used in place of the Hash, since the 
>> keys are
>> ordered numerical indexes.)
>
> Yeah, I noticed that only after looking at the code again a few days
> later. I think originally I had something else in mind, but in the end
> a simple array would have been sufficient.

And a touch faster.  ;)

James Edward Gray II