gabriele renzi wrote:
> Oh, and BTW, I may be wrong but it seem to me LOGO was just a strange 
> dialect of lisp, and thus maybe a real language by itself :)

Yup, Logo is a bastard child of mama Lisp, and it gets all the respect 
and support you might expect.

-- 
Glenn Parker | glenn.parker-AT-comcast.net | <http://www.tetrafoil.com/>