From: "ts" <decoux / moulon.inra.fr>
>
> >>>>> "M" == Mathieu Bouchard <matju / sympatico.ca> writes:
> 
> M> I think the most difficult part of writing a "Ruby for Java" interpreter
> M> is getting the parser right.
> 
>  I don't agree with you. The most difficult part is to have a j*v*
>  implementation which do *exactly* the same thing that the C
>  implementation. 
> 
>  I don't think that it's a good idea to have multiple implementations with
>  subtle difference between these implementations, like a P language ...

Sounds like a job for a C-to-Java translator?  ;-)

Seriously, though - anyone think that could be workable?  Ruby's VM
running on Java's VM?  Brute-force-like?


Bill