>>>>> "M" == Mathieu Bouchard <matju / sympatico.ca> writes:

M> I think the most difficult part of writing a "Ruby for Java" interpreter
M> is getting the parser right.

 I don't agree with you. The most difficult part is to have a j*v*
 implementation which do *exactly* the same thing that the C
 implementation. 

 I don't think that it's a good idea to have multiple implementations with
 subtle difference between these implementations, like a P language ...


Guy Decoux