Quoting pergesu / gmail.com, on Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 02:03:51AM +0900: > I don't want to override the protocol's idea of a timeout - I'd like > some means of specifying a timeout for the connection though. In > every other language I've used, I can set a timeout value on the > socket itself. It doesn't look like that's the case in Ruby. Is The C, perl, and Java networking APIS don't support timeouts on TCP connect(), and the C/BSD sockets API is what most (all?) other languages use internally. Out of curiosity, what are these languages? > there a method somewhere in the Socket classe heirarchy that lets me > specify a timeout? > > According to timeout, you can set an Exception that gets thrown when > it times out. I set that to StandardError, and just handle Not sure what you mean. You can make timeout raise errors other than Timeout::Error, and catch them, but you don't do so in the example you posted. > StandardError at the end. According to the docs, Timeout::Error can't > be used with rescue because it doesn't inherit from StandardError. I assure you that Timeout::Error can be caught by rescue, as I showed, I do it quite often and it works fine. > I'd still like some means of setting a timeout value for a socket > connection. That's a pretty basic aspect of the protocol, there's no > reason it shouldn't be in there. I see no evidence that user configurable timeouts on connect() are not part of the TCP protocol. Cheers, Sam > On Apr 2, 2005 9:37 AM, Sam Roberts <sroberts / uniserve.com> wrote: > > Quoting pergesu / gmail.com, on Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 08:05:15PM +0900: > > > I'm writing a little method that just tries to open a tcp socket > > > connection, then closes it off. I'm using timeout to limit the amount > > > of time it tries to connect (is there a better way?). If it times > > > > I have to wonder why you want to override the TCP protocols ideas of a > > timeout. The protocol designers and implementors have a pretty good idea > > of what the timeouts should be. If its not fast enough for you, you > > probably want too much. Doing this will make your code flaky and > > unreliable when the network isn't as fast as your local network. A good > > text on network programming should explain this. If you are finding your > > app is blocked, you can use ruby threads to do connections in the > > background. > > > > That said, you can't catch exceptions like that, try: > > > > begin > > Timeout::timeout(3) do > > long running op > > end > > rescue Timeout::Error > > p "hi" > > end > > > > Sam > > > > > out, I just want to say that the connect failed. Despite catching the > > > Timeout::Error (I think, anyway), I always get the Exception output. > > > First, here's the method: > > > > > > def execute > > > status = timeout(@timeoutval) { > > > socket = TCPSocket.new(@host, @port) rescue false > > > > > > socket.close if socket > > > return socket != false > > > } rescue Timeout::Error > > > > > > return false > > > end > > > > > > And now the output from my unit test: > > > > > > Started > > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:42:in `new': execution expired > > > (Timeout::Error) > > > from ./PortHostTest.rb:16:in `execute' > > > from ./PortHostTest.rb:15:in `timeout' > > > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/timeout.rb:55:in `timeout' > > > from ./PortHostTest.rb:15:in `execute' > > > from ./HostTest.rb:10:in `runTest' > > > from ../tests/test_HostTest.rb:14:in `test_simple' > > > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/testcase.rb:70:in `__send__' > > > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/testcase.rb:70:in `run' > > > ... 10 levels... > > > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:194:in `run' > > > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/autorunner.rb:14:in `run' > > > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit.rb:285 > > > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit.rb:283 > > > > > > > >