On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:56:27 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto
<matz / ruby-lang.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: Ruby Weekly News 21st - 27th March 2005"
>     on Wed, 30 Mar 2005 22:10:49 +0900, Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.ruby-talk / rawuncut.elitemail.org> writes:
> 
> |> I don't know how YARV relates to Rite ...
> |
> |No, that is perhaps the most interesting question.  Will YARV simply be
> |an intermediate VM for the 1.9 series and 2.0 be a complete rewrite of
> |everything, or will the codebase of 1.9, including YARV, be modified and
> |trimmed to become Rite?
> 
> Since YARV engine would achieve what I wanted by complete rewrite,
> I'd call YARV merged 1.9 as Rite.
> 
>                                                         matz.

That confirms what I just read here:
"YARV will become Rite ...if this project succeed[s]"
http://www.atdot.net/yarv/RubyConf2004_YARV_pub.pdf

btw, I did say "Wow!" when I read it.  Didn't you hear me? ;)

-- 
Bill Guindon (aka aGorilla)