bertrandmuscle / yahoo.com wrote:
> Thank you for the information.
> 
> It doesn't seem that you can chain them either, which is too bad.
> 
> I'm just surprised by this-- that's a pretty glaring inconsistency. It 
> should be in everything or nothing.

"Everything or nothing" is a good first-order rule.

But as you start to examine things more deeply, sometimes you find
reasons that some should be left out.

I'm sorry I don't have an example -- I agree it's unconvincing for
me to make such an assertion without backing it up.


Hal