Mathieu Bouchard schrieb:
> My only regret with that, is that I can't define a method whose "name" is
> actually an array.
> ...
> Do you like the idea of non-Symbol selectors?

At least it's an interesting idea, but I imagine this would be hard to 
read. Couldn't you fill a hash with associations from your non-Symbol 
selectors to actual methods? You'd need a special method calling syntax 
anyway.

Regards,
Pit