Aredridel ha scritto:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:50:04AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>
>>In message "Re: Paul Graham recommends Ruby"
>>    on Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:42:59 +0900, "David A. Black" <dblack / wobblini.net> writes:
>>
>>|Matz: can you clarify where this is going?
>>
>>Nowhere.  I'm just experimenting new syntax, such as
>>
>>  * a lambda without "lambda"
>>  * call without "call"
>>  * explicit block local variables
>>  * etc.
>>
>>They are fragile by nature.  They might be removed in the future.
> 
> 
> I rather like the idea of a lambda without lambda, and moreso the call
> without #call. 	I can see the fragility, but I've wanted it. I'd love it
> if it's possible without wrecking things.

I agree, even if I think a little messing up it's ok, if the stuff that 
gets broken is in remote corners. I don't expect ruby to be the same for 
  ever.