On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:50:04AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: Paul Graham recommends Ruby"
>     on Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:42:59 +0900, "David A. Black" <dblack / wobblini.net> writes:
> 
> |Matz: can you clarify where this is going?
> 
> Nowhere.  I'm just experimenting new syntax, such as
> 
>   * a lambda without "lambda"
>   * call without "call"
>   * explicit block local variables
>   * etc.
> 
> They are fragile by nature.  They might be removed in the future.

I rather like the idea of a lambda without lambda, and moreso the call
without #call. 	I can see the fragility, but I've wanted it. I'd love it
if it's possible without wrecking things.