Hi,

In message "Re: RubyGems, RPA and best tool for the job"
    on Wed, 16 Mar 2005 03:24:28 +0900, Chad Fowler <chadfowler / gmail.com> writes:

|>  I'd happy to merge the packaging system (with
|>  which both teams can agree) in the standard Ruby.
|
|They already have.  But it seems to me that Matz feels we need to
|converge on a common format (between RubyGems and RPA).  We don't.  I
|propose that we already "agree" to the necessary level.  We have
|totally different goals, with some confusing implementation overlap.

I just don't want to discourage one side by merging another.  If RPA
camp say "OK, we go our way, nevertheless Gems merged in the
distribution", that's fine for me.  Did they?

							matz.