On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:59:26 +0900, Richard Dale
<Richard_Dale / tipitina.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> Nicholas Marriott wrote:
> 
> >  lighter and more free than Qt (not to mention the
> > fact that google fails to turn up a website for ruby-qt and it doesn't
> > appear in FreeBSD ports, making it useless for me)

Urge to.. defend Qt... rising!...

> If there is demand, Alex Kellett and myself will be happy to release a
> commercial paid for version of QtRuby for Qt 4.x.

Could you give some details on how this would differ from whats
already available?

-- 
spooq