Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

>You don't have to agree here.  Each language designer have different
>point of view.  I'm not going to change my mind by your "should".
>
Let me rephrase: the semantics of eval should be defined in a way that 
holds no surprises. I would expect that writing

    ...
    eval "code"
    ...

and

    ...
    code
    ...

should be identical.

-- stefan