Iwan van der Kleyn <none / none.net> writes:

> All the "end"s are rather superflous and its a bore to fix them and
> their indentation while refactoring. So my question is: couldn't the
> "end" statement be made optional through some global switch or signal
> to the parser?

I think this sort of thing has come up before.  Certainly the whole
"significant indentation" issue's been rehashed again and again.  It
seems most rubyists prefer the `end's.