khaines <khaines / enigo.com> wrote:
> You _probably_ don't want to use Webrick, then.  I count 8 static images on
> that page.  If they are served with webrick, too, your time to service a
> complete page request will increase quite a bit, and you will definitely not
> be happy when you are slashdotted.

The static images are not a problem, they can be served by an external
server like they are now.

It's just that using WEBrick makes things nice and convenient
implementation-wise...  I hope it'll work out in practice.

Cheers,
Navin.