James Britt wrote:
> 
> I'm inclined to think that a lightweight DB falls into the same whatever 
> category as YAML or XML processing: it's the sort of thing that many 
> developers will find useful in enough situations that there is an 
> argument for having it as part the standard library.
> 

Well, enough people are answering positively that it may be worth
getting Matz's opinion.

Matz: Can we put some kind of standardized trivial database in the
Ruby distribution? If so, what should it be?


Hal