"David A. Black" <dblack / wobblini.net> writes:

> Hi --
>
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Alexander Kellett wrote:
>
>> On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:58 PM, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
>>> It shouldn't be in C. Such things should be in Ruby.
>>> :(
>>> I don't know C, so I can't learn Ruby?
>>> So can't I know the behaviours of my changes?
>>
>> in the current ruby implementation this
>> is the case. hopefully an alternative
>> implementation will be available eventually :)
>>
>> (be it rubydium or ruby2c/metaruby)
>
> Although this raises the old question of what an "implementation of"
> "Ruby" is....

And that these are not necessarily easier to understand than the C
implementations...

> David
-- 
Christian Neukirchen  <chneukirchen / gmail.com>  http://chneukirchen.org