"Austin Ziegler" <halostatue / gmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:9e7db91105021804385d91a8ac / mail.gmail.com...
> On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:34:51 +0900, Phil Tomson <ptkwt / aracnet.com>
wrote:
> [...]
> > "[...]This is a far different approach than UML's
> > general, wide-purpose models. For example, UML class diagrams
> > can be used for conceptual modeling, object-oriented analysis
> > modeling, object-oriented design modeling, logical data modeling and
> > physical data modeling.[...]"
>
> FWIW, the author of that statement is wrong. UML cannot be effectively
> used for either logical or physical data modeling. It's too based in
> object modeling. People who use UML for ER/data modeling are making a
> huge mistake. There's far better modeling methodologies out there than
> UML.

Just curios: what do you think are the major shortcomings of URL that make
it inappropriate for ER modeling?

Kind regards

    robert