Joao,

I am really curious about continuation-based web frameworks. Can you
give us some examples in how this kind of web development can be
different/better than what is done with a more "standard" framework
such as Rails ?

Rgds

Joao Pedrosa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For the last couple of days I've been deepening my knowledge of Wee.
> From the point of view of a programmer (not a designer, which I'm
> not), Wee is awesome. I still need to workout a full example, but Wee
> has been behaving the way I expect, so I wanted to say a *thank you*
> to Michael for creating a truly gem. I know that the entry barrier is
> not easy (not as compared to Rails,) but it's worth it. At least you
> will come to know a different way of building web-applications.
>
> Wee is Ruby in both senses. :-) It has a default O/R mapper (Og) and
> scaffolding ala Rails. Wee is OO and has its own magic, thanks to its
> inheritance (Seaside,) so thanks Avi Bryant, author of Seaside, for
> his creativity and for lending a hand to Michael.
>
> I hope Wee will keep improving and become a major player just like
> Rails and Seaside. :-)
>
> I think I have found what I was after (for the web) since I started
using Ruby.
> 
> Cheers,
> Joao