gabriele renzi wrote:
> Asfand Yar Qazi ha scritto:
> 
>> Good enough for me.  That Azureus java nonsense was getting on my 
>> nerves - I want my memory back!
> 
> 
> I don't think azureues is that bas :)

Azureus - no.  Java, YES.  I wish Azureus would compile with gcj into 
native binary code - I don't think it uses many AWT stuff, it uses gtk2.

> BTW, it seem to me this pharse is incomplete:
>  >> " A patch exists (indeed, has existed for many
>  >>   months), and if I bug Matz"
> 
> I also wonder why that patch was'nt merged.