On Feb 8, 2005, at 10:50 AM, gabriele renzi wrote:
> maybe he meant that we do not have, yet, a rubyish standard gui[1] or 
> audio engine, and that our engine is much slower than Squeak's.
> Maybe it could be more interesting to hack a ruby interface *for* 
> squeak instead of reinventing the wheel :)

i can't stand squeak personally
though it has some useful tools.

i'll try and do a rpa/gem for qtruby4
whenever its out. maybe then we'll have
an easy to install cross platform gui
then we can actually make a good class
browser :)

> [1]
> well, I think TkRuby should be that, but people seem to dislike it no 
> matter how many cool things hidetoshi nagai put in it (html support, 
> graph support, theme engines..). Anyway we can hope that ruby/wise get 
> some more work or that MorphR appear :)

does it look pretty now? if so. screenies?

Alex