Alexander Kellett wrote:
> and YARV, well, just look at the benchmarks!
> sure there are a few minor missing features, but
> on the whole, other than bugs (which ko1 would
> more than glad to know about i guess ;) its
> certainly not something to ignore :)

Does it support C extensions, file IO, sockets, (native) threads? 
There's not a lot of information about the status on the YARV website.

> so just to check, people are actually interested
> in a faster ruby right?

Of course!