Hi --

On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote:

> "David A. Black" <dblack / wobblini.net> writes:
>
>>> So false is bigger than 9?  Math books will need to be rewritten. :-)
>>
>> I assume the expression would short-circuit once one of the
>> sub-expressions returned false, since
>>
>>    x < y < z
>>
>> cannot be true unless x < y.  So there would never be a false < z
>> comparison.
>
> So < would get a special operator.
>
> Please keep my beloved < as it is!

I agree.  I don't want it to change -- just discussing the way the
chained version works.


David

-- 
David A. Black
dblack / wobblini.net