> LçÉettçËäº E S <eero.saynatkari / kolumbus.fi> > Aihe: Re: nil question > > > LçÉettçËäº "David A. Black" <dblack / wobblini.net> > > Aihe: Re: nil question > > > > Hi -- > > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote: > > > > > "David A. Black" <dblack / wobblini.net> writes: > > > > > >> Hi -- > > >> > > >> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Christian Neukirchen wrote: > > >> > > >>> "William James" <w_a_x_man / yahoo.com> writes: > > >>> > > >>>> Sam Roberts wrote > > >>>>> In ruby, zero and empty strings are true > > >>>> > > >>>> Since 0 is true, you should be able to do this in Ruby: > > >>>> > > >>>> puts "yes" if -5 < x < 9 > > >>>> > > >>>> The phrase '-5 < x' should yield the value of x instead of true. > > >>>> That's the way it actually works in the Icon programming language. > > >>>> But we have to use the klunky > > >>>> > > >>>> puts "yes" if -5 < x and x < 9 > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> Erm, say, x is -16: > > >>> > > >>> (-5 < x) < 9 > > >>> (-5 < -16) < 9 > > >>> -5 < 9 > > >>> -5 > > >>> > > >>> -5 is true, probably not what you want. > > >> > > >> But -5 < -16 is not true, so it wouldn't get that far. (I assume > > >> William means it should return x if the expression is true, false > > >> otherwise.) > > > > > > So false is bigger than 9? Math books will need to be rewritten. :-) > > > > I assume the expression would short-circuit once one of the > > sub-expressions returned false, since > > > > x < y < z > > > > cannot be true unless x < y. So there would never be a false < z > > comparison. > > So... > > class Numeric > alias :old_lt :< > alias :old_gt :< > > def <(val) > val if self.old_lt val > false > end > > def >(val) > val if self.old_gt val > false > end > end > > >> x = 5 > >> puts 4 < x < 6 > => 5 > >> puts 6 < x < 7 > => false > > ? Stupid webmail. Fixnums and Numerics probably just use <=> and <, > from Comparable instead, so this'd require changes to the core there. Also: class FalseClass def <(val) false end end # And this... >> x = 5 >> puts 4 < x < 6 # ...should of course return: => 6 # or 'true' in a conditional. > > David E