--- "Keith P. Boruff" <kboruff / optonline.net> wrote: 
> But.... if you think Ruby is impervious to needing
> any refactoring because
> it's less "verbose" than other languages, I would
> not agree. 
> 

I don't think people are claiming that Ruby programs
never need to be refactored but rather that since
they're less verbose refactoring is easier, so that
you don't need the same heavyweight refactoring tools
that languages like C++ and Java require

--
Mark Sparshatt



	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com