--Apple-Mail-5--263450671 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On 27 Jan 2005, at 15:29, Curt Sampson wrote: > Ruby asked me to give up a lot of useful type checking in order to get > duck typing. It does not have to do so. If it continues to do so, one > day a language is going to come along that offers what Ruby does but > doesn't make this compromise, and people will start switching, just as > people are now switching from Perl to Ruby because Perl doesn't "need" > a > better syntax for OO work. We've had this debate before. Please go read the past discussions [1] before trying to bring something new to the table, or saying ruby needs 'X' to be successful. Especially since we've got lots of ways to add typing to ruby already [2] [3]. [1] http://www.google.com/search?q