Hi .. 

 On Wednesday 26 January 2005 10:33, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng wrote:
>
> I'll probably stay with the pure ruby one, but I'll certainly look
> at this.  I suspect that the 1 might be the problem for what I'm
> trying to do. I can't remember how LL differs from LR now, but I'll
> find that pretty easily.
>
If you are starting from scratch, then LL(1) usually isn't a problem.  If you 
can define the grammar in well formed BNF, then LL(1) will be fine.  The real 
problem comes with feature creep and making sure that you don't hose your 
grammar too much ;-)

Regards,

-- 
-mark.  (probertm at acm dot org)