On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:12:22 +0900, Nicholas Van Weerdenburg
<vanweerd / gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:00:33 +0900, Austin Ziegler <halostatue / gmail.com > wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:44:33 +0900, Jim Weirich
<jim / weirichhouse.org > wrote:
>>> Chad Fowler said:
>>>>> Yes, location too -- sorry, not Sydney. Announcement to follow
>>>>> fairly soon....
>>>> Aren't you all in my mind with me? Wasn't it obvious that
>>>> "time" meant location in this context? ;)
>>> Well, obviously you were speaking four dimensionally and meant a
>>> point in Space/Time.
>> Range, not point. ;)
> Really? Why is that?

A point in spacetime is a single location and instant; a range
allows for both variance in location (e.g., the various locations of
the conference centre/hotel(s) and restaurants) and time (the
typically two and a half days of conference).

-austin
-- 
Austin Ziegler * halostatue / gmail.com
               * Alternate: austin / halostatue.ca