Douglas Livingstone wrote:
> Less "authority" and more "confidence". I can't talk for mst users,
> but for me I'd like the confidence to say "That there is the Ruby
> documentation." That is a main issue. 


I have to say this is the first time I've ever heard anyway suggest that 
they could not tell that the docs at ruby-doc.org were the actual Ruby 
documentation.


> Can't we apply the "fun to use"
> principle to the documentation *and* the language itself?

Yes. Why do you ask?

James