Daniel Berger wrote:
> trans.  (T. Onoma) wrote:
> > I'm taking a little poll.
> >
> > Let say you're Matz, but without any of the pressures of keeping up
> with a
> > previous version of Ruby. What one thing above all others would you
> like to
> > see differ about Ruby?
> >
> > T.
>
> I vote for using a leading underscore instead of "@" sign for
instance
> variables.  Perhaps a leading double underscore for "@@" (class
> variables).

Oh, I also forgot to add that I would like 'require' to check its
current directory first, so I can stop doing "$:.unshift Dir.pwd".
Regards,

Dan