On Jan 15, 2005, at 8:28 PM, Joao Pedrosa wrote:
> It was cool to think about it in your example. I'm not in a hurry to
> get this working, though. What I have is good enough for me (a simple
> working editor)... But, I still need to provide full syntax
> highlighting... hehe.

take a look at ruvi. and gruvi.
they have full and sane syntax
highlighting based on aeditor's
lexer and my own additions to get
the syntax highlighting more vim
like (as i love vim's highlighting
much nicer than anything else)

Alex