Bauduin Raphael wrote: > Hi, > > I'm happy to announce the second public version of logtails. This > version is a big improvements on v0.1 (see below). > No, no, I didn't think everybody put logtails' page on rubyforge as their homepage, it just got lost in the edition of the announcement.... http://rubyforge.org/projects/logtails Raph > Again, big thanks to Richard Dale for his help and feedback on using > Korundum! > > Raph > > > *Description: > > If you need to watch log files and are tired of opening tens of > terminals and ssh to a remote host to run a tail -f, logtails could be > for you! I've started this project out of this need and it's starting to > fill it. Suggestions are welcome. I'm especially interested in feedback > from people using net-ssh not installed as a gem. > > > > *Improvements: > > -Opening of local file is possible with KDE's "open file" dialog > -Filter lines: enter regexps that either reject the line (meaning it > isn't displayed) or force the line's display (even if there's a regexps > that would normally reject it). > -Tooltips on the text output show you which patterns are accepted and > which are rejected > -One files' lines can be displayed in different tabs, each tab applying > different filters. > -A file, local or remote, that is already monitored can be reused > without entering any info. No new connection or process is started, > internal buffers are used. > -When requesting a new remote tail, the current user's login is the > default value for the ssh login > -When requesting a new remote tail, an existing remote tail's parameters > can be used as the base of this new tail, only changing the file eg. > -Internally, the code is a bit better structured. > > *Known problems: > > -Tabs can't be closed > -key based authentication is needed to open an ssh connection > -The drop down in the dialog to open a local file sometimes gets too > much expanded > -Adding an accepted regexp doesn't make all other lines rejected by > default. If the user enters an accepted patterns, it's supposed that > (s)he doesn't want lines without that pattern to be displayed. > > * Plans for the future: > -Correcting know problems ;-) > -Add configuration items and history > -Highlighting of text that triggered the display of the line > -Saving a tab's content to a file > -Printing a tab's content > -Enable search > -Better use of KDE's infrastructure > -Merge 2 files' output in one tab > -Add a change indicator in the tab selector >