Nicholas Van Weerdenburg wrote:
>
> I used to be able to run ruby scripts without the .rb extension. I
> assume this was because .rb was added to PATHEXT or similar.
>
> Was this behaviour changed for this version of the installer?

No, this behavior was not changed. I just ran a test on a Win XP and a Win
2000 Pro system, and in both cases PATHEXT was correctly set to include .RB
and .RBW -- has anyone else had this problem?

Curt